CLEO Help Scan string problem

[Ravenous]

Can someone tell my this isn't working?

{$CLEO}
0000: NOP
repeat
wait 50
until 0AFA: is_samp_structures_available



0B34: samp register_client_command "chl" to_label @activated_76764
0B34: samp register_client_command "test" to_label @activated_76765
   

While true
wait 0
0ac8: 1@ = 260
SAMP.GetChatString(99, 1@, 2@, 3@, 4@)
0AD4: 28@ = scan_string 1@ format "Name: {CECECE}%s{FFFFFF} | Number: {CECECE}%d" 8@v 6@
free 1@
end
                    


:activated_76764
chatmsg "chatline: %s" -1 1@
samp.CmdRet

:activated_76765
chatmsg "number: %d" -1 6@
chatmsg "name: %s" -1 8@v
samp.CmdRet

when i do /test i get something like this:
number: 0
name: Ravenous

So the number doesn't get stored i don't know why.

Here is an actual chatline: 
Name: {CECECE}Ravenous{FFFFFF} | Number: {CECECE}6969

 

[Ravenous]

This is the chatline
Name: {CECECE}Ravenous{FFFFFF} | Number: {CECECE}6969

if i do
0AD4: 28@ = scan_string 1@ format "Name: {CECECE}Ravenous{FFFFFF} | Number: {CECECE}%d" 6@
then 6@ gets the value 6969

if i do
0AD4: 28@ = scan_string 1@ format "Name: {CECECE}%s{FFFFFF} | Number: {CECECE}%d" 8@v 6@
then nothing happens to 6@ it shows me the value 0

why is this? i need to store the numbers of different people on the server so the name won't always be ravenous.

 

[monday]

if everything seems right but is not working you could "go paranoid" and check the same code using variable 30@ instead of 6@, probably won't help but that's what I'd do;p

 

[Mennims]

What are you trying to do in the script?

---

I tested your script and simulated the chat the server would send, and got the same issue as you. What server is this and how do I get the server to output this text? The problem seems to lie with the colour codes. If i were to remove the colour codes entirely, from both the scan_string and and the add_message_to_chat opcode, it works perfectly. From what I've found out the scan_string needs to have the correct colour codes and in the exact format as the server output, then it should work.

 

[springfield]

Seems right, maybe you're using wrong color codes. You should also use that opcode as a condition, it returns the number of results.