MTA

Zin

Expert
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
1,697
Reaction score
105
NAOP cuz MTA say fuck off to .ASI's DLL's and things maybe there is a way but every server is different whereas most SAMP servers are based on the files that you download with SAMP.
 

0x_

Wtf I'm not new....
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
173
It isn't worth the work, MTA:SA is actively working against hacks.
They got their kernel driver in place also, it's possible but it's just not worth the time for public hacks.
As soon someone get's his hands on it the MTA:SA team is patching it.

And even if you get a long "standing" public hack, the chance that server's are detecting it is hiiiiigh as MTA:SA has deep client implementations for servers, basically means every ac (if a server has own) is usually different and efficient.
 

Infam0s

Active member
Joined
Apr 2, 2016
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Fuhat said:
If MTA is so well protected, why didn't they do the same thing with samp ?

cuz samp built for hax, thats why.
jk, maybe samp tought that could be "fun" if anyone create is own anti cheat system, or someting like that, idunno, ask them...
 

Schinko

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2013
Messages
187
Reaction score
1
Maybe samp developers are just noobs about anti cheats systems  :LOL:
It looks like it would be a massive work for them, but actually they need to say fuck off to ASI's and DLLs, like mta does.

That would be a big good step against cheaters, but they won't do it, because they like us  :me gusta:
 
Top