Philosophy hacks

[T3KTONIT]

LET Therefor be Therefore <---

How to remove any one or anything !

Step 1. learn hypnosis
Step 2. acquire target information.
Step 3. hypnotize the target so that he will not be Thinking
Step X. Make sure he's not thinking
Step 4. if he still exists then repeat step 3 and step X

According to decartés philosophy, I think, therefor i exist OR therefor i am. It should work perfectly since, I don't think,therefor i am not OR therefor i don't exist is perfectly logical !, Congratulations your target doesn't exist anymore. and therefor you're mentally challenged!


Post your philosophy hax bellow !:

 

[TheZeRots]

Why are you using arhaic "therefor" in a context of "therefore"?

1. Find someone below your level of acquired intelligence.
2. Read carefully through his sentences.
3. Complain on his grammatically incorrect sentences.
3.5. Keep doing that until he pursuits out of his low mind.
4. /Win.

Now, you don't want me to show of real, big philosophy, now, do you, eh?

 

[T3KTONIT]

Why are you using arhaic "therefor" in a context of "therefore"?

1. Find someone below your level of acquired intelligence.
2. Read carefully through his sentences.
3. Complain on his grammatically incorrect sentences.
3.5. Keep doing that until he pursuits out of his low mind.
4. /Win.

Now, you don't want me to show of real, big philosophy, now, do you, eh?

Your hack doesn't work :/.
Let me try it on you perhaps it will...

 

[TheZeRots]

[quote author="TheZeRots"]Why are you using arhaic "therefor" in a context of "therefore"?

1. Find someone below your level of acquired intelligence.
2. Read carefully through his sentences.
3. Complain on his grammatically incorrect sentences.
3.5. Keep doing that until he pursuits out of his low mind.
4. /Win.

Now, you don't want me to show of real, big philosophy, now, do you, eh?

Your hack doesn't work :/.
Let me try it on you perhaps it will...[/quote]

lawl obviously works

 

[Lugi.]

Decartés states Philosophy, I think therefore I am yet this does not prove the existence of anything or anyone else. What if life is solely a creation of one single beings mind or soul. I think therefore I am, but do you really exist outside of my mind or soul? All of our senses only touch the surface, they do not define or prove existence of others do they?

 

[T3KTONIT]

Decartés states Philosophy, I think therefore I am yet this does not prove the existence of anything or anyone else. What if life is solely a creation of one single beings mind or soul. I think therefore I am, but do you really exist outside of my mind or soul? All of our senses only touch the surface, they do not define or prove existence of others do they?

ALRIGHT ALRIGHT ALRIGHT GEEEZ !!! IT WAS JUST A JOKE OKAY... I GIVE UP LOL

 

[TheZeRots]

Decartés states Philosophy, I think therefore I am yet this does not prove the existence of anything or anyone else. What if life is solely a creation of one single beings mind or soul. I think therefore I am, but do you really exist outside of my mind or soul? All of our senses only touch the surface, they do not define or prove existence of others do they?

But... that... it doesn't make sense... or you're just mocking his post? xD


What if a man is deceptive of his own vision of deception upon himself? Does the man realise through oblivion that he is indeed oblivious of himself, or at least his perception of himself? And how does that man look upon the world and indeed himself for that matter then? #ViciousCirclePhilosophy.

 

[Lugi.]

ALRIGHT ALRIGHT ALRIGHT GEEEZ !!! IT WAS JUST A JOKE OKAY... I GIVE UP LOL

Lmao, That's why I have been posted this text Jesus Christ, owned.