Please link me to another cheat that has my GUI? When you're buying a cheat, you're not only looking for "unique" features, theres a quality aspect to it too. If thats the case, why buy Aimware when you can just buy an ayyware paste? Also link me to another cheat that has our "identical" feature set. If you send me a CLEO then there is really no point in arguing with you lol.
CAC_ReadMemory is completely useless. Most server owners won't even know why its used, or how to use it properly. Other than that, the server has to tell the client that its requesting memory, meaning the client can completely spoof or block the outgoing data. Lets not act like SAMPCAC isn't the piece of shit that it is. They're still sending your password to the server completely unencrypted last time I checked.
This will be my last response for the sake of this topic
@supahdupahnubah please keep it topic oriented.
In which way CLEO's "have no point"? I don't like em, but it's still valid.
For
me (and that's a completely focused on me) it looks like any other HL2 / CS:GO cheat, the menu structure, color scheme.
Now you're doing the same as your "PR" guy
@Safa shit talking sorry for being that harsh but you're actually undermining the work of other people without ANY proof.
I completely emulated SAMPCAC v0.10.0 and the "authorization" packet only contains the packet identifier and serial and the challenge packet a somewhat let's say not fool proof time offset calculation. Anyway, if you want to look for yourself the JOIN packet is RPC 180 and the challenge 183 (whole cac range is 180-185) check em.
Now I am asking you to proof your argument otherwise don't talk shit, yes they're using cracked software (VMProtect), yes violate license(s) but that doesn't allow you to falsely accuse them, atleast accuse them for things they actually do.
About CAC_ReadMemory being useless, nah not that useless you can go out of the "GTA SA" address space, check region flags, read the PEB structure, don't forget how advanced a simple function can be in the right hands.
Nevertheless, I don't have anything against you
@y0mike or
@Safa I just gave my opinion as a reaction to
@Safa's clashing with other developers if you're running a "paid cheat" provider then this behavior is just unprofessional and childish I would've never posted anything without him talking bad about other people (because I didn't want to state my opinion exactly because of this), negative things hang longer around people minds and I didn't want to accidentally "hurt" the provider as-is.
Anyway, as already stated I wanted to not spam your advertisment with discussions, please open a seperate thread in the Smalltalk section if you somehow feel the need to argue publicly.
